No. The tax rates have to be adjusted so that those needing no assistance see no increase in income. There is a phase out. We can't give everyone more, at least not indefinitely.
Ubi can replace existing benefits, be less than, or greater than. I'm not arguing here which it should be but if greater than, people well beyond need for assist…
No. The tax rates have to be adjusted so that those needing no assistance see no increase in income. There is a phase out. We can't give everyone more, at least not indefinitely.
Ubi can replace existing benefits, be less than, or greater than. I'm not arguing here which it should be but if greater than, people well beyond need for assistance would need to see higher rates beyond just paying back ubi and end up with less than now.
No. The tax rates have to be adjusted so that those needing no assistance see no increase in income. There is a phase out. We can't give everyone more, at least not indefinitely.
Ubi can replace existing benefits, be less than, or greater than. I'm not arguing here which it should be but if greater than, people well beyond need for assistance would need to see higher rates beyond just paying back ubi and end up with less than now.