There is, of course, no reason only one of the three viewpoints must be chosen. Laws and societal norms could balance multiple points of view, and probably should.
I am partial to individualism, and think it should have the greatest weight, but I see some room for considering equality. I'm suspicious of the "realism" point of view, as I h…
There is, of course, no reason only one of the three viewpoints must be chosen. Laws and societal norms could balance multiple points of view, and probably should.
I am partial to individualism, and think it should have the greatest weight, but I see some room for considering equality. I'm suspicious of the "realism" point of view, as I have only seen it used to support veiled racism.
With race there is also a problem that "race" is a fuzzy concept with no clear footing in science or genetics. Only the individualism point of view is unaffected by this fuzziness.
There is, of course, no reason only one of the three viewpoints must be chosen. Laws and societal norms could balance multiple points of view, and probably should.
I am partial to individualism, and think it should have the greatest weight, but I see some room for considering equality. I'm suspicious of the "realism" point of view, as I have only seen it used to support veiled racism.
With race there is also a problem that "race" is a fuzzy concept with no clear footing in science or genetics. Only the individualism point of view is unaffected by this fuzziness.