After accusing me of knowingly spreading BS, engaging in smears and dirty tricks and ad hominem attacks about secret evil motives, etc. and accusing Arnold of endorsing this.
I did not respond in kind. This is not the kind of interaction that appeals to me.
I rejected all three perspectives, not just the one you are defending…
After accusing me of knowingly spreading BS, engaging in smears and dirty tricks and ad hominem attacks about secret evil motives, etc. and accusing Arnold of endorsing this.
I did not respond in kind. This is not the kind of interaction that appeals to me.
I rejected all three perspectives, not just the one you are defending, and provided links to explain why. I have nothing more to add.
"asked nicely"
After accusing me of knowingly spreading BS, engaging in smears and dirty tricks and ad hominem attacks about secret evil motives, etc. and accusing Arnold of endorsing this.
I did not respond in kind. This is not the kind of interaction that appeals to me.
I rejected all three perspectives, not just the one you are defending, and provided links to explain why. I have nothing more to add.
For the record, YOU opened by accusing realists of being bigots. That IS bull, and being bull, it IS an ad-hominem smear about secret evil motives.