Arnold often emphasizes the importance of the Dunbar number (group size larger or smaller than ~150) as a threshold for formal vs. informal management organization. Above the Dunbar number almost everything must be reduced to text: policies, procedures, workflows, etc. Below the number there is more reliance on face to face interactions,…
Arnold often emphasizes the importance of the Dunbar number (group size larger or smaller than ~150) as a threshold for formal vs. informal management organization. Above the Dunbar number almost everything must be reduced to text: policies, procedures, workflows, etc. Below the number there is more reliance on face to face interactions, unspoken rules, etc.
I wonder if this threshold is also applicable to LLMs in some fashion. They seem to have an "above Dunbar" aspect in that they are much better at handling requests that involve pure text as opposed to those that entail speech and the subtleties of human interaction, such as Hoel's problem.
Arnold often emphasizes the importance of the Dunbar number (group size larger or smaller than ~150) as a threshold for formal vs. informal management organization. Above the Dunbar number almost everything must be reduced to text: policies, procedures, workflows, etc. Below the number there is more reliance on face to face interactions, unspoken rules, etc.
I wonder if this threshold is also applicable to LLMs in some fashion. They seem to have an "above Dunbar" aspect in that they are much better at handling requests that involve pure text as opposed to those that entail speech and the subtleties of human interaction, such as Hoel's problem.