19 Comments

I think "culture wars" is an inaccurate (and losing) description of what the right is fighting against. A more accurate description of a large part of the fight is the fight against institutionalized anti white (and anti asian) racism. One side favors race based discrimination; the other doesn't.

The right had been so demoralized by the left that they are terrified to call things by their proper names and instead use euphemisms like culture wars.

Expand full comment

It's pretty simple really. There is indeed such a thing as the culture war which isn't a euphemism, but when a cultural faction marshals or involves the powers of the state to enforce its preferences, that's political war and thus fair game to be countered by political means. It's just ridiculous when people write as if the rules of engagement for the former scenario should carry over the latter, very different, state-weaponized scenario.

Look, if one believes in pacifism and unilateral disarmament even if that means your opposition gets to steamroll right over you, "it is better to die than fight back," then the honorable thing to do is to have the integrity to say so explicitly and express that one is comfortable with the steamroller scenario. It is at least a little dishonest or misleading to say that one ought not pick up one's shield as if one's opponent had not already raised his sword.

Expand full comment

Regarding electoral sabotage, this can backfire. In the 2016 presidential campaign, many Democrats were enthusiastic for a Trump nomination believing he was the least electable of the primary candidates.

Expand full comment

I think there's a distinction between sabotage and participation. It depends how close the vote gets split between the parties.

If the vote is close, then the incentive is for strategic manipulation of the other party's primary, that is, sabotage and dirty tricks, legal or not.

On the other hand, when you live in a one-party district, the primary of that party is the real election. If you're going to bother voting at all, then registering as a member of the other party and voting for the more moderate candidate is the only way to participate and make your voice heard and your vote count.

Expand full comment

Good point; apparently this is the case in Wyoming where many Democrats have reportedly permanently registered Republican, though that was not enough to save Liz Cheney. Meanwhile, President Trump has endorsed Democratic primary candidates in New York, giving them fulsome praise that is no doubt highly unwelcome. A nice touch of humor....

Expand full comment

"As you know, I don’t think very highly of using political means to fight the culture war. But the counter-argument is that the rest of us are 'culturally nonexistent' and so we have no choice."

Perhaps I don't follow the various issues closely enough, but I have yet to see a recent instance of the right using political means to fight the culture war. What I've seen instead is the right using political means to fight a hybrid political-culture war that the left created and dominates. Take the Disney matter: Disney began moving sharply left during the Eisner era, adopting increasingly progressive attitudes and corporate policies across all divisions (e.g. Disney's Pride Day, which dates back to the 90s.). Disney's move to the left only accelerated during the last decade, particularly during DeSantis's tenure. At no time, however, did Florida's government retaliate politically/legislatively, because Disney's cultural disposition is its own business.

This all changed with the PRE bill though, to which Disney voiced opposition as a matter of official corporate policy (as opposed to left-leaning execs mouthing off to the press as citizens). Disney, the corporate behemoth it is, thus chose to play the role of political combatant to actively oppose and undermine legislation that has nothing to do with any of its core businesses; Disney entered this arena of its own volition. This is precisely what prompted the revocation of Disney's special district, as DeSantis stated quite explicitly. Mind you, the purpose of the PRE bill was to thwart the left's practice of using public-school curricula, which is squarely within the purview of the state, to promote their particular cultural preferences. The left, as is its wont, drew first on this one.

Pronoun lessons and pride flags in 2nd-grade classrooms come before the PRE bill and dissolution of Reedy Creek in the political order of operations. The right is merely playing defense in their own zone.

Expand full comment

I'm skeptical that the "dismantle" group is accurately named. Many want to dismantle parts of government, changing the focus of coercion, but there seems little appetite for small government.

Expand full comment

Marshal: "Size" of government seems the wrong metric. I want things done differently without caring very much if that requires more people and dollars or less. Police reform, probably more. Climate change? A tax on net CO2 emissions would probably mean less direct intervention at the technology level. CDC and FDA using cost benefit analysis would I suspect require more personnel.

Expand full comment

The size of government in this context is not meaningfully measurable in readily quantifiable terms such as budget or personnel, and indeed those numbers are highly misleading distractions.

The real size of government is a fuzzy and abstract notion about the scope of its powers, the complexity of its rules, the difficulty in ascertaining and predicting the consequences of ones actions, the degree and manner of the exercise of its authorities, and the overall impacts upon and distortions of the varieties of human action.

If one absolutely needs to use some objective measure, one would be better off counting new pages per year in legislative bills, judicial opinions, the code of federal regulations, or in issues of the federal register.

Expand full comment

"I don’t think very highly of using political means to fight the culture war."

The culture war, particularly in schools, has been fought almost entirely through political means. Kling's comment suggest he just hasn't noticed it. I'd recommend Richard Hanania as the best at explaining this; specifically "Lessons from the Frontlines of the University Wars" with Richard Lowery.

"The output of culture can’t be legislated on demand"

This is naive. Even the example of Disney: I can't find the link, but I read a Disney insider explaining how the Disney leadership previously wanted to stay out of unrelated politics, but groups of mostly DEI staff successfully pressured the leadership to go woke. Those DEI staff were ultimately forced onto Disney through political means.

Expand full comment

Looks like Gurri is coming around to the reality of "The Empire Strikes Back" answer to The Revolt Of The Public. He thought that the elites couldn't get the toothpaste back in the tube, but when you see the tube filling back up again, it's time to adjust your priors.

I'm going into the eighth year of repeating my position, but to say it again, Gurri seemed to miss where social media really did change things in a discontinuous fashion and in a manner hard to reverse or adapt to, while attributing phenomenon to it which were nothing new from a historical perspective.

For example, consider his 'nihilism' argument about groups being mostly against the status quo regime but unable to unite as being 'for' anything. Ok, now consider words Hayek wrote about 80 years ago:

"It seems to be almost a law of human nature that it is easier for people to agree on a negative program, on the hatred of an enemy, on the envy of those better off, than on any positive task. The contrast between the "we" and the "they", the common fight against those outside the group, seems to be an essential ingredient in any creed which will solidly knit together a group for common action. It is consequently always employed by those who seek, not merely support of a policy, but the unreserved allegiance of huge masses. From their point of view it has the great advantage of leaving them greater freedom of action than almost any positive program."

See? It's not the media, it's the masses. If the masses count, this is what you get. And it doesn't matter if it's led or leaderless. Anything involving rallying "huge masses" tends towards 'nihilism' as a natural consequence of the principle of the lowest common denominator, with examples going back a century (and much more) before social media.

Expand full comment

Perhaps they should be called social mass media.

Expand full comment

Re. youth age verification: The phrase "secure federal website" is an oxymoron.

Expand full comment

Providing your social security number to a website is asking for disaster. The federal government let my personal data get hacked and allowed a scammer to get a SBA coronavirus loan in my name. I would rather be considered underaged than be a victim of identity theft again.

Expand full comment

Trustable age verification would be a nice thing. In a different country we could do it right, and we would.

But just like all the examples for that, "That's how you got Trump," meme, there are now far too many reasons for why, "This is why we can't have nice things."

Expand full comment

The only way to get rid of dirty tricks in politics is to get rid of politics.

Expand full comment

>>I would like to see as a one-time punishment all of the Democratic Congressmen who work on the DCCC be stripped of committee assignments for two years.

That's a great idea Arnold

Expand full comment

It doesn't matter what the voters/polled want. The only thing that matters is what the people who run the government want.

Expand full comment

The Democrats have been doing this kind of thing for years because it works, unfortunately. I’m glad folks are finally noticing.

Kansas only has a Democrat governor because third party candidate Greg Orman siphoned off enough Republican votes to give the win to Democrat Laura Kelly. Wichita has a Democrat mayor who only won 46% of the vote when democrats dumped a ton of money into another third party candidate.

Really dishonest stuff.

Expand full comment