What's particularly humorous, and I need to read Huemers post maybe he addresses it, is that in his older essay "In defense of passivity" he directly explains why to not trust experts. As you pointed out, he uses the results of experts on experts to dismiss most people who are thought of as experts! Curious to read this new post he has m…
What's particularly humorous, and I need to read Huemers post maybe he addresses it, is that in his older essay "In defense of passivity" he directly explains why to not trust experts. As you pointed out, he uses the results of experts on experts to dismiss most people who are thought of as experts! Curious to read this new post he has made as his original essay was highly influential on my worldview.
What's particularly humorous, and I need to read Huemers post maybe he addresses it, is that in his older essay "In defense of passivity" he directly explains why to not trust experts. As you pointed out, he uses the results of experts on experts to dismiss most people who are thought of as experts! Curious to read this new post he has made as his original essay was highly influential on my worldview.