I think that some cultural conflicts can be described as wars of the sexes. In these wars, not every male is lined up on one side, and not every female is lined up on the other. But one cultural stance may naturally appeal to more people of one sex than another. In the resulting conflict, perhaps males have to accommodate to females. Perhaps it will be the other way around. Or maybe some compromise will emerge.
Prohibition
For example, in the 19th century, two important female causes were women’s suffrage and temperance. These causes advanced in tandem, culminating in the 18th amendment banning the manufacturing and sale of alcoholic beverages and the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote (they previously had achieved voting rights in many individual states).
But Prohibition did not go smoothly, and by the time that Franklin Roosevelt took office in 1933 the nation was ready for its repeal. In terms of the wars of the sexes, women eventually lost the battle for Prohibition.
Social Justice
Since the 1960s, women have increased their presence in important American institutions. These institutions have become more oriented toward social justice. In addition, women have altered the norms of discourse and decision-making within these institutions to conform to a more feminine approach. Below is a table that illustrates these differences in terms of pairs of expressions where males and females tend to differ in which expression they prefer.
Masculine Feminine
Competition | Equity
Merit | DEI
Free Speech | Safety from hate speech or misinformation
Elon | Fauci
Police | Social Workers
Innovation | Regulation
In recent decades, many institutions, especially academia, have been trending in the feminine direction. There was always some resistance, and some of the votes for Mr. Trump may be attributable to that resistance. But I would caution against interpreting the election itself as an indicator of the long term outlook for the choice between masculine and feminine approaches to approaching the challenges of human interdependence.
I think that the most recent war of the sexes is far from over. The outcome I would prefer is one in which there is less overt hostility between the masculine and the feminine. My ideal society would be on in which we are eager to include women in all of our institutions, but that women appreciate the value of some of the masculine ways of mediating social interactions.
Instead, I worry that women will continue to dismiss masculine values as “toxic.” If the war of the sexes continues to be fought as it has been for most of the past few decades, then women are likely to win, but the victory will be hollow.
"My ideal society would be on in which we are eager to include women in all of our institutions"
Perhaps we think of different things as "institutions" but I think it is important to have some things that are all male and some that are all female. What are sometimes referred to as "male spaces" and "female spaces". Most everyone can agree that there is nothing wrong with a therapy center for rape victims being all female. And the law in its sexism says "women's colleges" are perfectly fine--because women are more comfortable there and more able to thrive. There are plenty of circumstances where males are more comfortable and better able to thrive in all-male groups, and I think we should not automatically think it is progress to have females in them.
As the world has become more accommodating for women and their standard of living gone up, not only feminists, but women in general have only become more hostile towards men, masculinity, patriarchy, and society. In many ways the feminist movement pushes that society (through government) owes women a lot in terms of both equality and equity but women really don't owe anyone anything. Not their parents, men, or society in general.