Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rick Gibson's avatar

On a related but possibly tangential note, I’ve noticed that politicians are quoting “the experts” these days, when justifying their policy decisions. Too often, the experts they quote are, in fact, activists or advocates, by which I mean people who push one side of an issue, look only at the evidence supporting the one side, and ignore and/or denigrate anything relating to the other side. Careful consideration of policy decisions, looking at all the evidence and the pros/cons of various paths, has been abandoned in favour of choosing a single ideological path and then justifying it after the fact. Examples are numerous, including the Covid response, the government approach to climate change, etc.

Expand full comment
Mike G's avatar

Thoughtful, provocative as always.

I also oppose the righteous, close-minded activist. As well as close-minded non-activists.

Doesn't a more open-minded person, though, often learn "through activism?"

Sometimes you join a "movement" - and realize people involved don't actually have plausible solutions. Or their motivations for joining are - about dating.

Sometimes you do direct service - tutor a kid perhaps, or clean a park - and perhaps feel motivation, or notice inefficiency, or learn "technical" things.

If you were advising an open-minded 20 year old poli sci major who is currently spending 100% of "learning" time studying for their 4 or 5 college classes....wouldn't you say "Find an issue, get involved, learn that way too."

It may be that some amount of "activism" accelerates lifelong learning for open-minded people.

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?