Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dallas E Weaver's avatar

I just believe my son's understanding of the subject. He has been working in the area since the start. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abcKL_x_aoA

Expand full comment
The Null Hypothesis's avatar

Step one: separate Bitcoin from crypto.

Everything besides Bitcoin is a speculative bet on some as yet unproven application for the blockchain. “Use our great software that for some reason needs its own money!” Just doesn’t make sense to me. I know why you would want to print your own currency, but I have no idea why I would want to use it.

Bitcoin is holding up well because it has one purpose only - digital monetary asset. It has performed this function very well and continues to grow in attractiveness in the QE infinity world.

Arnold is correct - one hurdle is the perceived difficulty of self custody. Self custody is critical because it removes counter party risk which is a key feature of Bitcoin. It is now much easier in the past, but needs to improve further. Big gains have happened here this cycle and they will continue. (See unchained capital, swan Bitcoin, casa)

I’m not sure why a fidelity or BNY Mellon providing custody services wouldn’t be attractive to some large portion of the investment community. The investment community doesn’t custody their own stocks, why would they be immediately hung up on this for Bitcoin (the only thing they should be buying as a digital asset)?

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts