re-post: My Communist Vision
first posted one year ago
[The Zvi recently remembered this post, and I thought it was worth re-posting.]
My wife grew up on a cul de sac in suburban Baltimore. I grew up on a cul de sac in suburban Saint Louis. We moved into our first house six months after our first child was born. Guess where we moved to? A cul de sac.
When a group of young families is situated on a cul de sac, it becomes something like a commune. The kids play together, out in the street or at one another’s houses. Parents babysit one another’s kids. They form carpools. The result is that each parent’s burden of caring for children is reduced.
Happy grandparents
Years later, what is the outcome? Most of our children are married. Many of them have children of their own. We and our neighbors are grandparents. We are happy and satisfied with our lives.
This sort of Communism is what people should aim for. We need more communes, in which young married couples have large families.
We are not Orthodox Jews, but Orthodox Jewry encourages communes by requiring adherents to attend synagogue and not allowing them to use machinery on the Sabbath. Forced to live within walking distance to a synagogue, they live close to one another. They naturally live in communes.
A good lifestyle is one that leads to having grandchildren. Ordinary heterosexual relationships are part of that lifestyle. I am not out to shame people who are LGBTQ. But for heaven’s sake, don’t shame people who are not!
I see no need to confuse young children by bringing them to “drag queen story hour” or giving them lessons in alternative sexuality well before they have reached puberty. If they are at all inclined to be heterosexual, encourage that. It is the path to having grandchildren.
People are more likely to have grandchildren if they get married and start having children in their early twenties. That means that you cannot spend your twenties accumulating school credentials and sex partners. You cannot wait until you have sufficient income to buy whatever you want. As a society, we should de-emphasize higher education, sexual exploration, and materialism.
These days, there are many housing developments that are senior-friendly. They may be limited to people who are over 55. This sort of housing discrimination is legal.
Why not have housing developments that are for young families? In order to move in, you must have at least one child under the age of 10? That would encourage the sort of communal arrangements that make it easier to be a parent.
Such a development could include a day-care center. Perhaps it would be staffed by parents, under a communal arrangement.
Households would remain distinct. The commune would not be a collective.
The commune would not be self-contained. Parents would go to work elsewhere. They would do their shopping elsewhere.
Communism at the level of the state is a terrible idea. Communism at the level of a small neighborhood is a lifestyle that can lead to grandchildren.


I remember reading this post when you first posted it, and I find the basic argument convincing. In fact it is one of the things that influenced me (a 26-year-old) towards wanting children and away from wanting to spend 5 years doing an economics PhD.
However, I take issue with the following:
"If they are at all inclined to be heterosexual, encourage that. It is the path to having grandchildren."
If a couple adopt a child, and that child grows up to have children of their own, the first couple are now grandparents. Gay couples can adopt children. Therefore, heterosexuality is not a necessary condition for having children.
So I don't really see why you need to include that line in a post about the desirability of grandchildren. I don't want to be that guy, but it seems a little homophobic.
I think you are espousing Communitarianism, not Communism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communitarianism
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/communitarianism/index.html