Discussion about this post

User's avatar
forumposter123@protonmail.com's avatar

"When I talked more with Bryan, he recommended hiring more nannies."

I thought Bryan had something interesting to say, but reading the SSC piece and Scott's comments I guess it all boils down to "be rich enough to afford nannies."

That's not terrible advice as public policy (money would work!) but doesn't help anyone that can't afford a bunch of nannies (you know most people in their prime fertility window).

As to free range parenting the problem is that nobody else is doing it. And if you do find one that does it they often just let them stare at screens all day because its less "free range" and more "I don't give a shit."

Expand full comment
Charles Pick's avatar

The Scott Alexander article was actually pretty good in that he challenged the accuracy of the data multiple times. Nullius in verba.

The declining literacy issue is a long term trend, but the effect of the phones is perhaps overstated. It is less of a client device issue and more of a server issue. Millennials were made more stupid by cable TV and the early internet, which connected them with unending pap. But even the TV for children was usually more limited; you could only watch so many hours of trash before you ran out of it.

Now anyone can access more personalized trash than they can possibly consume, and it's like smoking crack all day. Debating about whether taking crack through a spoon, through a pipe, or ingested in some kind of slurry is mostly marginal. The bulk of the medium "lives" on servers and the fact that it is delivered to phones is only marginally important.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts