Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam Cassandra's avatar

On personality psychology. My understanding of Meyers-Briggs used to be similar to Dr Kling's, and I read the 300-page manual years ago, but I have learned recently that Jung was much richer and clearer on this topic (the YouTube videos by Alexis Kingsley are a friendly introduction). The main problem is 16 types is unwieldy.

I have seen the wieldy DiSC (developed by William Marston, Harvard PhD, polymath inventor, and creator of Wonder Woman) used by multiple large organizations, and found it to be a good input for hiring decisions, ice-breaking, team-building, and development conversations. It is related to "interaction styles" and I have seen a mapping to Meyers-Briggs (on a CS Joseph YouTube video -- his early ones are good, before "fame" and divorce hit him). The Personality Indicator and Enneagrams seem to be variants, but I have little experience with them.

The Big Five is the state of the art for the academically minded. It is good, simple, and evidence-based via lexical-statistical analysis rather than theory.

I believe all of these measures add value if used prudently. For example, I would read a candidate's DiSC after I interviewed them, to avoid confirmation bias. Jung, who aimed to reconcile science and religion, will really help you understand your blind spots. Go NTs! :o)

Expand full comment
Gordon Tremeshko's avatar

The idea that most business books are junk strikes me as more or less correct. I've been asked to read a couple in my day as part of various managerial training programs and both were a complete waste of time. However, I'm skeptical about the value of substituting books about supremely talented athletes and musicians. I'm not sure what the business world equivalent of having a 40" vertical leap or being able to write and play a tune as catchy as "Hey Jude" might be, but any strategy that starts with that as a given probably isn't likely to work for us mere mortals.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts