Since the prototype doesn't depend on AI, could that have been written 30 years ago? any guesses why this style of education isn't already extremely popular, and whether the AI version will change anything about those reasons?
30 years ago it was unlikely a professor could produce this in under an hour. With ai, the professor can rapidly iterate and perhaps produce something that is popular.
Pretty good little PP example. Getting the form of the answer is important.
I’d suggest making #2 & #3 both more explicit “numeric value” rather than just value with a light grey number in the answer box, which is good & prolly enough for most.
The AITA idea is good, but also kind of what you want Claude to make for each concept. Along with test questions.
I was reminded by Grok that the independent variables are usually X, but in a dual consumption goods tradeoff, it’s pretty arbitrary. For opportunity cost, the common give up Y to get more X.
Grok mentions the more tangible, agricultural on X as a tiny custom, dominated by other considerations since it’s arbitrary.
Arnold, did Claude or you decide on the axis? Grok’s notes on this was interesting to me, so thanks for the, as usual, excellent mental stimulation.
Excellent example. This could also be a valuable resource for high school economics students. Perhaps it could even be developed into an MRU project?
Since the prototype doesn't depend on AI, could that have been written 30 years ago? any guesses why this style of education isn't already extremely popular, and whether the AI version will change anything about those reasons?
30 years ago it was unlikely a professor could produce this in under an hour. With ai, the professor can rapidly iterate and perhaps produce something that is popular.
Pretty good little PP example. Getting the form of the answer is important.
I’d suggest making #2 & #3 both more explicit “numeric value” rather than just value with a light grey number in the answer box, which is good & prolly enough for most.
The AITA idea is good, but also kind of what you want Claude to make for each concept. Along with test questions.
I was reminded by Grok that the independent variables are usually X, but in a dual consumption goods tradeoff, it’s pretty arbitrary. For opportunity cost, the common give up Y to get more X.
Grok mentions the more tangible, agricultural on X as a tiny custom, dominated by other considerations since it’s arbitrary.
Arnold, did Claude or you decide on the axis? Grok’s notes on this was interesting to me, so thanks for the, as usual, excellent mental stimulation.