Links to Consider, 10/31/2024
Lorenzo Warby on the epistemic crisis; Freya India on alternate reality; Quico Toro and Guido Nunez-Mujica on solar power; Alice Evans on surveys of men
What is needed is a root-and-branch purging of the universities. This means massive closures of worse-than-useless Faculties and Departments, breaking-up of universities and the regulation that universities should have been able to do for themselves, but demonstrably—and catastrophically—have failed to do. It also means stripping away requiring university qualifications for any job, apart from a very narrow range of professional qualifications and, even there, the revival of alternative means of qualifying.
You don’t have to like that paragraph. What I found most interesting in the essay was a chart showing that in Islamic societies scientific authorship was inversely related to madrassa authorship. The source is a paper by Eric Chaney. An excerpt from the conclusion of his paper:
Starting in the eleventh century, scientific activity began to decline in the Islamic world. The data patterns do not support the essentialist idea that Islam and science are incompatible. Rather, the results suggest that the political empowerment of religious leaders negatively impacted scientific development. Newly empowered elites restricted intellectual production and discouraged interpretations of Islam that undermined their authority. These actions decreased the incentives to engage in scientific activity and helped drive the decline.
Warby’s rant reflects a worry that our universities will otherwise behave like madrassas.
by far the most depressing invention I’ve seen lately is a new app called SocialAI, a “private social network where you receive millions of AI-generated comments offering feedback, advice & reflections on each post you make.” In other words, your own imaginary ‘X’, with infinite “simulated fictional characters”. You, alone, in a vast social network of AI bots.
I’ll bet none of you ever read, or even heard of, The Universal Baseball Association, Inc., J. Henry Waugh, Prop. I was a big Strat-o-Matic addict when the novel came out, but I never read it.
Quico Toro and Guido Nunez-Mujica write,
For solar to serve as the backbone of a grid, it needs to be backed with storage. That can come in the form of batteries, hydrogen, or pumped hydro. All of these are expensive; none of them scale. Storing a kilowatt-hour of electricity in a chemical battery costs an order of magnitude more than just generating it in a nuclear power plant. Which is why a 100% solar grid would be insanely expensive, even though generating solar power is basically free.
Over half of men say dating has become more difficult, a core issue repeatedly stressed in my interviews with young American men.
Other studies of men ‘falling behind’ tend to omit this, but my qualitative research suggests it is psychologically central. A rising share of men are now unpartnered, feeling unwanted and lonely.
Her post includes many interesting survey findings, mostly from a Pew study.
She concludes,
The American public expresses strong support for gender equality - both in terms of female leadership, marital names, and engaged fathers.
However, we see two frictions:
A substantial minority of men identify as ‘masculine’, and feel their identity is demonised.
Dating is increasingly generating frustrations.
The men who identify as masculine and feel that masculinity is demonized are disproportionately Republican and/or Black or Hispanic.
substacks referenced above: @
@
@
@
I certainly can sympathize with Warby wanting a purging of the universities after reading about some of the nonsense being inflicted on university students in Australia (https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/school-life/multiple-victorian-unis-banning-students-from-completing-studies/news-story/1d661765e447d70f8feec365a5960a87 ) but as reading Dr. Kling’s substack has trained me to ask, “who is going to do the purging?”
In the United States, at least, it might be worth considering some of the reform measures that have been advanced. For example, the College Cost Reduction Act (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6951 ) that was reported in the House this year would seem to put the onus on the credential peddlers to clean up their act and eliminate pointless woke programs by making them financially responsible for when graduates of those programs fail to achieve employment sufficient to pay off their student loans. (https://edworkforce.house.gov/uploadedfiles/1.11.24_h.r._6951_the_college_cost_reduction_act_fact_sheet_digital_final.pdf ). It would also afford prospective students greater information about the costs of programs and their expected return on investment, increase clarity about transfer of credits, reform the accreditation grift, as well as provide comparative information about competing programs. I would have to think about all of the provisions for a while before advocating for it, or not, but my gut is that it is a step in the right direction, especially since several of the higher education lobby groups expressed concern about it. It can’t be all bad if the grifters hate it.
Another option for starving the beast, would be to advocate for the award of credit for study under independent scholars. As I understand it, in the early European universities, students paid tuition directly to teachers for instruction in a given subject. Now that independent scholars have their own lobbying groups, perhaps there might be some practical support for similar such arrangements today? Students would be able to patronize real scholars with a substantial incentive to provide meaningful education rather than getting stuck in the clutches of sinecured woke indoctrinationists.
And perhaps most importantly, if the United States had a functional vocational education system such as Australia’s (https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/education/education-and-work-australia/latest-release#qualifications-held - note that in Australia, “certificate level III” means something like, if I understand correctly, has the knowledge and skills of someone who has completed a 3-4 year apprenticeship) one might expect the enrollment in outfits peddling woke program credentials to be greatly reduced. Unfortunately today many students lack confidence in the ability to find employment through vocational education and instead go to BA peddling outfits because they have been led to believe that credential has greater earning power.
How many more thousand times do we need to hear the Toro/Nunez-Mujica "insight" [Actually they leave out CCS as a way of "storing" zero MC electricity and that the costs of all these kinds of storage can fall over time]. But the implication that the alternative policy implication is obvious is quite frustrating. Giggling at or even shaming silly solar boosters is not a policy.
If you want less of something bad (net emissions of CO2 and methane), tax it.