Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Handle's avatar

"And who would - without necessity or accident - have children in a high-rise environment featuring fug-filled air that causes asthma, streets filled with rushing vehicles, public spaces designed for adults, and places dominated by strangers."

Um, what? Is Cooke unfamiliar with the many volumes in a whole late 19th-mid-20th century Old-Progressive literature panicking about there being not too little but far too much fertility in such dense urban circumstances, indeed, circumstances that were in many respects far worse and less wholesome for raising children? Riis is spinning in his grave. That didn't stop anybody, and no, these recent ancestors were not clueless about ways to control family size or helpless before the introduction of hormone-based birth control.

It's amusing how far people will go to concoct absurdly ahistorical stories as desperate attempts to find an alternative to having to accept politically inconvenient truths staring everyone in the face.

Expand full comment
Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

Well, yes, but SF is the poster child for bad urbanism: crime, homelessness, restrictive land use and building codes, bad public schools.

Maybe the indictment should be of "Progressivism" rather than urbanization.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts