Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Alcorn's avatar

Few persons in orgs have self-knowledge or psychological insight to understand these archetypes and dynamics. Thus life in orgs tends to be opaque even to the players. The rare player who views the stage (the workplace) with detachment nonetheless usually lacks an analytical framework that sees through it all.

Expand full comment
Laurence Phillips's avatar

A good description of the ecosystem of most (all?) large organizations. Over time, rebels are sidelined or encouraged to seek employment elsewhere. The “feminization” of the upper reaches of major organizations is a topic worth exploring. It would, for example, be interesting to know how research activities in large organizations governed by women differs, if at all, from those controlled by men (type of research conducted, number of patents, the market potential of innovations, … .) Another “character” worth understanding in an organizational context is the “champion,” the person who takes it upon him- or herself to push a worthwhile, but initially unpopular, policy or course of action.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts