Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher B's avatar

My initial reaction is to disagree mildly because 'high trust' (if I understand the usage correctly) implies more than just cooperation. A low-trust society has plenty of cooperation, as you note obliquely, it's just that the trust and cooperation flow from pre-existing relationships, most often familial or tribal. Members of a high trust society not only have high levels of cooperation but are more likely to cooperate even when they have no pre-existing relationship with the other person or group,

stu's avatar

I'm not saying you are wrong, we should surely for careful, but your concern about "inherent" sounds like something that would come from a leftist. It reminds me a bit of complaints about Mischel's marshmallow test. Many complained he was saying people who failed were inherently inferior but as I understand it, he never made a conclusion about the cause, just the likely outcome down the road.

In this case, inherent can have multiple meanings. It can point to the individuals but it can also be about the culture, which seems like what you are saying. In this I find the swiss-italian region fascinating. The primary language in southern Switzerland is Italian yet on both sides of the border they behave more like people in German speaking Switzerland on the other side of the Alps than central and southern Italians in both work ethic (Romans are said to be lazy) and willingness to obey the rules, including paying taxes. Probably other ways too.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?